Wood Seeks Favoritism in California Construction

Words: Julie TrostGet used to hearing about AB 2842. On February 16, 2018, this bill was introduced in the California legislature.

The especially troubling language is bolded for emphasis:
  • This bill would require GO-Biz [aka the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development] to work with state academic institutions and certification organizations to perform additional product testing that accelerates the development, use, or commercialization of new wood products, as provided.
  • This bill would require the [California Building Standards Commission] to work with local planning offices, developers, and architects to consider the feasibility of expanding the use of wood and mass timber in California buildings. The bill would require the commission to identify additional seismic, fire, or other testing of mass timber that is necessary for the use of mass timber in building construction.
  • This bill would require the [Department of Forestry and Fire Protection] to develop the California Wood Innovations Small Grants Program to provide grants and low-interest loans or loan guarantees, upon appropriation by the Legislature for these purposes [purposes such as employment in rural and urban areas and economic development for rural communities], to entities that expand the use of wood products and increase in-state wood product processing and manufacturing, as provided.
  • This bill would appropriate $20,000,000 to the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development for purposes of providing grants, loans, and loan guarantees for projects that add mobile or stationary sawmill capacity for the in-state processing and production of wood products from forest and vegetation management projects that are intended to reduce the risk and intensity of wildfires.
The bill's author (Assembly Member Bigelow) and coauthors (Assembly Members Gallagher and Mathis) represent Republican districts in northern and central California in which agriculture and/or forestry are prominent industries.

We are rallying the troops to combat this measure. Washington and Oregon states have been down this road, and we are working with the masonry experts that were involved in those efforts. Our national association, the Mason Contractors Association of America (MCAA), has already offered their voice.

AB 2842 is tentatively scheduled for its first hearing on March 19, 2018. Be prepared to lend your voice to this fight by telling your local district legislators how it stands to hurt your business opportunities and could pose public safety concerns especially in the area of fire protection.

We will keep you updated.
What gives with head protection? Why workers want to keep their hard hats and ditch safety helmets.
April 2025

Last August, I took my pickup to the dealership for a nagging check engine light. While it was being looked over, I chatted with the salesman I normally deal with, and he told me about the latest and greatest 2025 models. He told me how the twin turbo inl

Government Affairs: Bringing North Carolina to Washington, D.C. and Hopefully Young People to Your Jobsites
April 2025

For you long time members of the Mason Contractors Association of America you likely remember our Annual Washington, D.C. Fly-In where MCAA members from around the country would come to Washington, D.C. meeting with Members of Congress from their home sta

Chairman's Message: While We Are Still Here
April 2025

I truly value my days working on construction sites during the summers of my high school and college days. Some moments in our youth are so clearly meaningful that we file them away in our subconscious to be recalled when life events require inspiration.

Contractor Tip of the Month: The Tough Calls That Define a Leader
April 2025

In construction, every project balances a delicate trio: coordination, precision, and timing. However, beyond blueprints and schedules, leadership demands something far greater—the ability to lead and make difficult decisions that shape the future of a co