Roles

employers that have been threatened or picketed are necessary parties to disputes under Section 10(k). The record in this proceeding fails to demonstrate that any of the Employers here have agreed to be bound by these agreements. Moreover, as discussed a

Conclusions
After considering all the relevant factors, we conclude that employees represented by Local 1086 are entitled to perform the work in the dispute. We reach this conclusion relying on the factors of employer preference and past practice, a

DETERMINATION OF DISPUTE

layers, not Iron Workers, is the charged party. Because there is no showing of a proclivity of the charged party to engage in unlawful conduct to obtain work similar to the disputed work, we find insufficient grounds to

Scope of the Award

Turner has requested a broad work award covering the entire geographic area encompassed by the Boston District Council of Carpenters' agreement with Turner. We find such an award inappropriate. Here, the labor organizations-L