SFAA members take construction bill to Congress

Words: Nearly two dozen representatives from SFAA member companies, along with SFAA staff, met with members of Congress, mostly in the Senate, and their staffs as part of SFAA’s annual Congressional Action Day. This year, SFAA and its members are focusing on getting the federal Construction Coalition legislation put into play, which includes simple procurement reforms that increase small business participation in federal construction projects. Representatives from contractors associations that are part of the Construction Coalition also participated with SFAA members in some of their Hill visits as part of the effort to get the Coalition’s bill dropped in the Senate.

“Congress came back from its spring recess with a limited agenda of ‘must do’ items before fiscal year 2014 ends on September 30, which includes funding the federal government beyond that date and funding the Highway Trust Fund. That’s a small but very difficult agenda,” says Lenore Marema, SFAA’s vice president of government affairs, who organizes Congressional Action Day. “Congress will be looking for issues that can be enacted on a bipartisan basis, and we’ve got just what they are looking for.”

SFAA is part of the Coalition, which includes all the other stakeholders in public construction. SFAA’s top federal surety issues, among others, are included in this legislation:
  1. Exempting the Miller Act bond threshold from the required periodic reviews for inflation. It makes no sense that the level of payment protection for subcontractors and suppliers on the job should be decreased as the costs of construction increase. Similarly, the bill would assure that the Miller Act protections are available on federal public-private partnerships (P3s). The need for performance and payment protection is exactly the same in a P3 as any other type of project.
  2. Requiring that the security that stands behind every federal contractor’s obligations to the federal government should be governed by the same rules. There should be either a corporate surety bond in place from a company approved by the U.S. Treasury or assets with readily identifiable value pledged and relinquished to the federal government while the construction project is ongoing.
  3. Increasing the maximum bond guarantee to sureties in the Preferred Surety Program of the Small Business Administration from 70% to 90%. This change would make the program more economically feasible for corporate sureties and their bond producers, which would increase their participation in the program.
“The changes to the federal procurement process in this bill are critical to small business participation, and this is a bill that can get passed with bipartisan support,” said Marema. A number of the provisions in the Coalition legislation already are moving through the House with bipartisan support.
What gives with head protection? Why workers want to keep their hard hats and ditch safety helmets.
April 2025

Last August, I took my pickup to the dealership for a nagging check engine light. While it was being looked over, I chatted with the salesman I normally deal with, and he told me about the latest and greatest 2025 models. He told me how the twin turbo inl

Government Affairs: Bringing North Carolina to Washington, D.C. and Hopefully Young People to Your Jobsites
April 2025

For you long time members of the Mason Contractors Association of America you likely remember our Annual Washington, D.C. Fly-In where MCAA members from around the country would come to Washington, D.C. meeting with Members of Congress from their home sta

Chairman's Message: While We Are Still Here
April 2025

I truly value my days working on construction sites during the summers of my high school and college days. Some moments in our youth are so clearly meaningful that we file them away in our subconscious to be recalled when life events require inspiration.

Contractor Tip of the Month: The Tough Calls That Define a Leader
April 2025

In construction, every project balances a delicate trio: coordination, precision, and timing. However, beyond blueprints and schedules, leadership demands something far greater—the ability to lead and make difficult decisions that shape the future of a co